Q1. So, in the end, how’d your WP2 paper go? What were you happy with? What weren’t you? Why? Be specific! I feel that my WP2 went well. I liked the topic I chose and found it to be genuinely interesting to learn about. I feel like that helped me break down the conventions and moves more. I was happy with how I analyzed the sources, I feel that the points I made were accurate and well defended. I am also happy with the overall flow tof the paper. I felt that my ideas flowed well into one another and was an improvement upon WP1. On the negative end I feel that I could have written a better intro and conclusion. I always struggle with writing an intro and conclusion, with on being satisfactory and the other weak. I still feel that the intro and conclusion were better than WP1, but not as good as I would have liked. Overall, I am happy with my WP2 and feel that I applied what I’ve learned over the course well into making the paper better.
Q2. Which 2 or 3 comments that you received yesterday were the most helpful for you? Why? The comments about my original intro and sentence flow were the most helpful to me. My original intro was fairly weak, I tried to do some sort of question thing that didn’t work out that well. I kept it there for future revision and couldn’t think of a way to make it work out. The comment kinda confirmed what I was thinking. The comment about sentence flow was helpful because it pointed out points in my writing where I got too repetitive. I began sentences with the same two words which made the reading boring, it was poorly done parallelism. This comment helped me find the points where the writing was weak and make them stronger.
No comments:
Post a Comment